- Have any questions?
- 020 7223 4887
- editorial@napo.org.uk
- Filter by
- Categories
- Tags
- Authors
- Show all
- All
- activity
- AGM
- anti racism
- approved premises
- attendance management policy
- Budget
- Cafcass
- Calendar
- campaigns
- children
- Committees
- conference
- conferences
- consultation
- contact
- contracts
- Corston Report
- Courts
- CRCs
- CSPA
- disability
- divers
- diversity
- domestic abuse
- drama
- Edrdige
- Edridge
- elections
- entertainment
- equalities
- facility time
- family court section
- Family courts
- Gauke
- GDPR
- Gender
- GFTU
- Grayling
- health
- health and safety
- Ian Lawrence
- interserve
- John McDonell
- JSC
- Judiciary
- Justice
- Justice Select
- Labour
- LGBT+
- Long form
- Magazine distributor
- member benefits
- membership
- Ministry of Justice
- MOJ
- Napo
- Napo Cymru
- NAPSAC
- NOMS
- NPS
- OMIC
- Organisation
- PAC
- parliament
- pay
- pension
- pensions
- Prisons
- privaisation
- prob
- Probation
- Probation Journal
- profe
- professional practice
- PSOs
- Public accounts
- quick questions
- rehabilitation
- retired
- reunification
- safety
- sentencing
- Serious
- service user
- SFOs
- Shared services
- Short Sentences
- Sickness absence
- Stewart
- stress
- structure
- survey
- Synthetic drug use
- tr
- trade union movement
- training
- transforming rehabilitation
- TUC
- ULR
- visor
- women
- Women Prisoners
- Women’s health
Serious Further Offence Reviews – harmful or helpful?
Many reading this article will have some knowledge or experience of a serious further offence (SFO) review. These reviews take place when a specified offence is committed by a person who is already under probation supervision.